Steve DeKnight posts at the Bronze Beta
and says it was never his intent to poke fun at the hard core fans in last night's episode (which he co-wrote with Drew Goddard). His four posts are in green font.
Also:
"Don't know what you've heard, but Sarah was never going to play an active part in this ep. Not from the conception, the breaking of the story, or the writing of it. As for Tom Lenk (Andrew), I love the guy and I'm very happy he was in the show. We had talked about Dawn doing those scenes, but Michelle wasn't available."
May 06 2004
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
mchan | May 06, 13:16 CET
leenah | May 06, 17:53 CET
How glorious that we love a show whose writers actually post and engage in discussions with fans. It's so unusual and so very cool.
phlebotinin | May 06, 18:03 CET
That being said, I thought that last night's ep was brilliant and a definite highlight of the entire series.
MindPieces | May 06, 21:16 CET
Unitas | May 06, 23:55 CET
It's as simple as that. Some of those posts made it sound like the writers killed a puppy and snacked on its entrails. I guess it's easier to pick apart someone else's work than create something of your own. There's constructive criticism and then there's just plain bitching because it's not how you would have done it. How arrogant. Mr DeKnight could have read some of those posts and decided to avoid any contact, but it sounds like he was keeping a promise to make an appearance. So very cool indeed.
bloodflowers | May 07, 00:24 CET
Many of the non-shippers were more tolerant of, and even amused by, the triangle content than shippers were (I'm one of those -- I loved everything else and enjoyed the way they addressed the A/B/S embroglio, but I'm tired of the triangle. I guess it goes without saying that I'd rather enjoy the show for itself, not the couples who may or may not be together on it).
I thought that's what the Immortal represented -- a kind of metaphor for the way people look at things, and how they tend to judge situations based on their personal investment. Was he good? Was he bad? Everyone had a different opinion of him based on their own perceptions and personal agendas, yet no one actually saw him.
It's similar to the way fans are looking at this episode, and the season as a whole. Polarized by extremes anchored in emotion. Like Spike said about the tiny liquor bottle in AHiTW (which was ref'd last night), it's all about perspective.
The Immortal wasn't good or bad as much as he was something in between, which is a lot harder to talk about and understand. I think Angel as a show is exactly like that. When you try to break it down into simple black and white, it's silly. But on a gray scale, it's an orchestration from light to shadow and back that can be breathtaking.
[ edited by Wiseblood on 2004-05-06 23:17 ]
Wiseblood | May 07, 01:14 CET
k8cre8 | May 07, 01:32 CET
[ edited by Kansas on 2004-05-07 00:18 ]
Kansas | May 07, 02:17 CET
Boo! | May 07, 04:15 CET
You'll have to go to the Archives link and then click on the one that says Posts before Thu May 6 22:07:43 2004. His posts are near the bottom.
Haborym | May 07, 06:55 CET