Nice article on why David Boreanaz's Bones may just be the best show of its kind on TV.
Also, contains season 1 and 2 blooper reels.
April 15 2008
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
I sat down to watch Season 2 of 'Bones' the other day with my 10 year old nephew. It was actually quite some time in before I realized- oops, decaying corpses and dead bodies! (Still, as a 'Supernatural' viewing veteran
Which in itself proves that 'Bones' ISN'T about the sensationalism of it's genre- it's a nicely driven character study.
One which just-so-conveniently-happens to star the studliest ever stud of studs!
missb | April 15, 08:31 CET
I do truly love this show. I started watching it for David, and because I'm interested in forensic science. I stayed because it's got great characters, portrayed by talented (And nummy) actors, written by gifted writers.
Just the right amount of humor, angst, technobabble and "Eww! Gross!" and believable storylines.
ShadowQuest | April 15, 09:55 CET
Tibbittz | April 15, 12:08 CET
It's a nice fan piece and I agree with a lot of it but its central premise seems flawed to me cos i'd say that all modern procedurals are also about the characters, you just can't get away with the old fashioned "mystery of the week and then total reset at the end" anymore. How well they each do it is just down to personal preference, what's "awkward" to some is fine to others.
That said, what 'Bones' does do IMO is (often) separate the character moments from the procedural elements which makes them easier to spot. 'Numb3rs', 'CSI' etc. (hell, even my biggest guilty pleasure, 'NCIS') have plenty but they're often embedded within the procedural scenes which means you have to keep your eyes open to spot them. So in that sense I think it's fair to say that 'Bones' emphasises character over the procedural elements more than other shows of its type which in turn makes it much friendlier to people that don't usually like procedurals which in turn may explain why we then have those people claiming it's the best procedural ever ;).
And re: "best ever", what about stuff like 'Hill Street Blues' or 'Cagney and Lacey' or even 'House' (if you stretch "procedural" slightly) ?
Saje | April 15, 13:20 CET
redeem147 | April 15, 16:06 CET
Kizzy | April 15, 16:07 CET
on the other side of that line is the head of a shark who is shampooing with Velveeta
Not quite sure I understand that one. Then again, I wear the cheese, it does not wear me.
OneTeV | April 15, 17:16 CET
Scaniano | April 15, 18:12 CET
BrewBunny | April 15, 21:23 CET
I'm surprised they said that though because the impression i've had all along is that "abstracting herself" was more or less a conscious choice she made early on in order to survive rather than an actual developmental condition, that she closed herself off to avoid pain and that Booth and her team are gradually bringing her out of her shell, showing her the benefits of trusting people (that might be coloured by the fact that i've always seen Brennan as a kind of nicer version of House though, who - tantalising hints aside - has always been portrayed as choosing to be how he is).
(and stick with 'Bones' BrewBunny, IMO it doesn't really gel until about half-way through the first season - before that I found it to be quite a standard procedural, albeit with an interesting lead character)
Saje | April 15, 22:13 CET
Supersymmetrical | April 15, 22:57 CET
beg2differ | April 16, 00:37 CET
They changed that BrewBunny ... it's Zack that has Asperger's. That contributed to his being sent home from Iraq ... he couldn't assimilate into a military team.
They originally were going to write Brennan that way but decided it would be better with Zack...
I agree with Saje that Brennan made a choice to withdraw as a survival mechanism . And from the very beginning of the show she was trying to 'broaden her horizons' by making Booth take her out into the field.
resa | April 16, 03:07 CET
BrewBunny | April 16, 08:05 CET