Tall. Handsome. Dutch.
Rutger Hauer mentions Buffy, briefly, very briefly, in this interview at Moviehole.net promoting the 2-disc extra super dooper special edition of Blade Runner.
December 03 2007
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
zeitgeist | December 03, 20:29 CET
Saw Rutger in "Agent of Orange" - good movie!
[ edited by RhaegarTargaryen on 2007-12-03 17:34 ]
RhaegarTargaryen | December 03, 20:34 CET
I'll be buying this though i'm in two minds about it. I really don't like the "Deckard is a replicant" view-point and Ridley Scott seems to have pushed this cut even further down that road. Kind of a pity, it squeezes some of the life out of the film for me.
(and I like Hauer. He's done his fair share of B movie crap but he always brings his A game, in his own slightly bananas way)
Saje | December 03, 21:02 CET
Kirochka | December 03, 22:13 CET
There are four performances that for various reasons will always stand out in my mind...
Blade Runner (of course)
Ladyhawke
The Hitcher
Flesh & Blood
Oh, and I have a perverse soft spot in my heart for the awful [i]Blind Justice[/i].
Haunt | December 03, 22:20 CET
Simon | December 03, 22:22 CET
igj | December 03, 22:47 CET
Ditto with the Ladyhawke love, and then my followup lament: Why don't pen-and-paper RPG's ever seem to capture such low magic worlds well?
jclemens | December 03, 23:13 CET
I think you mean Soldier of Orange, RhaegarTargaryen, but yeah, great movie by Paul Verhoeven.
Caroline | December 04, 00:04 CET
herb | December 04, 01:45 CET
fmwt | December 04, 02:09 CET
I haven't seen Hauer in much else, but he's a great replicant.
jcs | December 04, 02:11 CET
Simon | December 04, 02:16 CET
Caroline | December 04, 02:25 CET
ChosenOne5376 | December 04, 02:27 CET
jcs, if you've only ever seen the theatrical version then Deckard basically isn't a replicant (though there are hints, like his photographs etc. but these can easily be read the other way i.e. as pointing out how close replicants are to being human). If you've seen the director's cut, there are a couple of things (most notably, that he has the unicorn dream) that quite strongly suggest he's a replicant. And from what i've read, if you see the final cut (i.e. this one) it'll be even more explicit.
Ridley Scott has also stated categorically in interview that he is. And just to add grist to the mill, Harrison Ford has stated categorically that he played him as human.
(personally, I liked the ambiguity, so that you could see him as one if you wanted to or not if that worked better for you - bit annoying that Scott is basically forcing one interpretation on the story IMO)
Saje | December 04, 03:18 CET
And, um, Decker is so totally not a replicant. Because. He's not.
And I prefer the V.O. by Ford to the director's cut. It's not even close for me. I'm pretty clear in my preference. So I'm not so tantalized by the double pancaked version. And that's odd because I do like things that are stacked. Special hell.
RhaegarTargaryen | December 04, 09:14 CET
With Bladerunner (which I saw in its initial release in '82) being one of my very favorite films, I'm feeling a little conflicted about this new final cut. Regardless of how it's edited, though, I think it's an incredible sci-fi masterpiece. Having recently seen the director's cut, I still loved it even though RS had made the replicant angle more dominant. The story makes sense both ways, but the human angle has always felt more poignant to me because human-Decker fell in love with, and was arguably saved by, what he was trained to kill, while replicant-Rachel found her humanity in being accepted despite her origin. I'll probably end up getting the new cut anyway, just for the beauty of the print.
Something that made me like Hauer even more was finding out, at the end of his book, that he created the Starfish Foundation, to promote education and assistance for women and children with HIV/AIDS. He's not just a pretty face!
[ edited by Wiseblood on 2007-12-04 09:12 ]
Wiseblood | December 04, 12:08 CET