Joss talks about his favourite horror movies.
There's also some great discussion about Buffy season 8 in this FEARnet video interview.
September 16 2007
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
gossi | September 16, 22:49 CET
NotaViking | September 16, 23:24 CET
UnpluggedCrazy | September 16, 23:25 CET
Joss first (?) mentioned The Descent a fair bit ago. Actually, almost a year ago now.
The One True b!X | September 16, 23:30 CET
The Descent deserves to be seen for dealing with the idea of being alone from all manner of perspectives - being trapped, loosing your friends, family issues. Basically, it's a film about very real fears we have in life, wrapped in the extraordinary context of a horror film. Plus, it cares about it's characters.
I do find myself wondering which ending Joss saw, as I heard the US verrsion has a different ending to the original cut. Original cut basically asks the question of, if you fight through something horrific and end up alone, will you ever be able to deal with that? Will you want to?
I remember coming out of it thinking 'That was horrific. And so very great'.
gossi | September 16, 23:36 CET
He probably saw the original ending as that's whats on the DVD.
I guess there is something to be said about missing the theatrical release sometimes.
I couldn't watch the interview for some reason but I'm sure I will get the gist of it from people here who did.
theMidnighter | September 17, 00:19 CET
Pointy | September 17, 00:22 CET
The Dark Shape | September 17, 01:13 CET
The One True b!X | September 17, 01:52 CET
The Dark Shape | September 17, 01:56 CET
The Descent was a fantastic horror film that struck a chord with me on a visceral level. I'm sure all horror films hope to achieve this but very few actually do.
Hjermsted | September 17, 01:58 CET
[ edited by InevitableTraitor on 2007-09-17 01:55 ]
InevitableTraitor | September 17, 04:55 CET
The Dark Shape | September 17, 07:09 CET
The One True b!X | September 17, 08:32 CET
Personally, I don't find 'torture-porn' any worse than the slasher boom of the 80s, but whatever. 90% of horror films released today are terrible, as they always were.
The Dark Shape | September 17, 09:21 CET
Shey | September 17, 13:01 CET
And Saw has nothing more going on than torture, unless you count hilariously bad acting and silly scripting. (I've only seen the first.)
[ edited by UnpluggedCrazy on 2007-09-17 10:57 ]
UnpluggedCrazy | September 17, 13:57 CET
I saw the first Saw film, but have no interest in the sequels as I got the point. I don't need no torture franchise.
[ edited by gossi on 2007-09-17 13:15 ]
gossi | September 17, 16:15 CET
The Dark Shape | September 17, 19:22 CET
alien lanes | September 17, 19:30 CET
Willowy | September 17, 19:51 CET
Djungelurban | September 17, 20:11 CET
But is psychological torture really that awful? It's a horror movie, and tearing a character down mentally is incredibly powerful on screen.
I just think there's a difference between Saw, which tends to actually value life more than most horror films, and Hostel, which is literally about people being tortured for the amusement of an audience.
The Dark Shape | September 17, 21:03 CET
If I was being subjected to it I would probably say yes, but in terms of this particular film and the genre it inhabits, probably not within reason.
I can’t agree about ‘Saw’ valuing life, but I don’t think it is an especially unpalatable film, although I can’t pretend to have particularly enjoyed it. It was, at least, vaguely original. I have to agree with an earlier comment and say some of the acting is verging on being risible. I have also seen the second film. I am not unduly squeamish, but there were some scenes I found utterly repulsive in that one. Having said that, generally speaking I think I actually preferred it to the first film, although that might just be because of the extended presence of Dina Meyer, who I like a lot.
alien lanes | September 17, 22:13 CET
See, this is the thing. Let's say, for the sake of argument even though I don't buy it for a moment, that's there's "something else" going on in the Saw movies.
The people responsible for making these movies *illions of dollars aren't walking out going, "Man, I really like what it was saying about blah blah blah." They're walking out going, "Aw, man that was SICK and AWESOME. When they did X to Y? NASTY! It kicked ass! Let's go see it again!"
That is, ultimately and unavoidably, the "value" of these movies.
The One True b!X | September 18, 04:48 CET
Madhatter | September 18, 19:42 CET
The defense of slasher/torture-porn films that claim the fans are appreciating the "messages" and character development, is growing really tiresome.
Shey | September 19, 09:41 CET