(SPOILER)
Angel spinoffs "not happening"
according to Amy Acker in a short convention report at SyFy Portal (spoiler warning in case they ever make anything involving Gunn).
An awful shame. I really need to see more of this 'verse.
Very interesting about what would have happened to Gunn in season 6, I'd always seen him dying, but not coming back as a vamp.
May 15 2006
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
Jona | May 15, 21:03 CET
And now I'm gonna go cry...
jam2 | May 15, 21:05 CET
Interesting about Gunn, though...
escapist | May 15, 21:08 CET
It's almost worse to know a bit about what the plans might have been for the projects. Three projects centering around Faith, Willow and Spike? Oh lord. I'll join you in the crying section, jam2.
[ edited by phlebotinin on 2006-05-15 19:45 ]
phlebotinin | May 15, 21:14 CET
(Of course if it came down to differences in approach between Joss and Fox then a fan campaign could be futile now.)
Jackal | May 15, 21:15 CET
Charmuse | May 15, 21:19 CET
[ edited by Ghost Spike on 2006-05-15 19:24 ]
Ghost Spike | May 15, 21:24 CET
He knows that we have been eager to hear of any news on this subject, even if that news was negative. I would imagine that he would have taken five minutes to give us the heads up, assuming that the spinoffs really are not happening.
Just a thought.
Serial Rocker | May 15, 21:41 CET
I guess the comics may be the only hope left...
Morons...and yet a show with mindless bimbos, families swapping spouses, or eating the most disgusting insects and entrials will probably get renewed every year......go figure.
kathylovesspike | May 15, 21:42 CET
jam2 | May 15, 21:45 CET
Maybe Joss will weigh in here? Though I can only imagine his reaction would be, "Well, there is nothing definitive one way or the other. Now I must go slap Amy."
Rogue Slayer | May 15, 21:54 CET
Ah well. I had really hoped we'd see a Spike spinoff etc but it obviously wasn't to be. But we'll always have fanfic and comic books and Paris and stuff.
Joss in New York tonight accepting that Equality Now award and I'd feel extremely uncomfortable if this thread or indeed any thread at Whedonesque turned into "Hey Joss! Tell us what's happening!".
I'm sure the ins and outs will be revealed sometime soon.
Simon | May 15, 22:02 CET
Anyway, just to say from my point of view, this is a real shame. I'd heard rumblings of it being Spike, Faith and Willow project, and we all know it was due to tie into the Buffy season 8 comics more than likely.
You never know - it might actually still happen years into the future, but not any time soon, I'll agree with Mrs Acker on that. The world revolving around financing sometimes annoys me.
Edit: Simon wins. Also, to make something clear: Amy mentioned this at a Starfury convention. Starfury don't allow recording of guest talks, so there's probably misquoting of Amy here - it's very unlikely they have a recording of the talk. To what extent, I don't know, but don't take it word for word.
[ edited by gossi on 2006-05-15 20:08 ]
gossi | May 15, 22:05 CET
I suppose I would feel worse if I had been holding on to any glimmer of hope or if I didn't think Not Fade Away was a fitting (if angonizingly premature) ending. Still... damn it all, I miss those characters! And if FOX blew a chance to right a wrong and maybe earn a little forgiveness, well, I can't think of anything to say that doesn't end in 'rot in Hell'.
bloodflowers | May 15, 22:09 CET
Unless Joss pipes in here and debunks this info, I think it's safe to say, adios Buffy and Angel.
DarenG | May 15, 22:20 CET
I hear they may get computers sometime this century! :~D (Not that I think Joss carries around his laptop so he can keep on top of Whedonesque...)
And apologies Simon, though I wasn't actually asking for him to respond, more of an outloud wondering on my part, as this seems like a headline that might make him(and everyone else interested in this news) take notice. And I think Joss rarely ever posts in the threads where people ask him to. No, you find that guy in the oddest places...
Rogue Slayer | May 15, 22:21 CET
I'd like to compose something dignified and reasonable here, an elegy to the verse we know and love. But I can't. I'm just gonna throw my toys out of the pram here.
I want more Faith! Waaaaaah!
lone fashionable wolf | May 15, 22:31 CET
Which could probably be narrowed down to:
1) Creative control.
2) Budget.
3) Time scale.
Btw just to make it clear, I've amended the subject line that this comes from a con report.
Simon | May 15, 22:31 CET
gossi | May 15, 22:41 CET
palehorse | May 15, 22:41 CET
I know several people who attended the Starfury con. That's not a misquote. Ms. Acker said that.
menomegirl | May 15, 22:48 CET
gossi | May 15, 22:53 CET
spikeylover | May 15, 22:57 CET
So have I. And even though she said that, I think approaching it with caution at this time is a very good idea. Things could and might change in the future.
There's always hope.
menomegirl | May 15, 23:02 CET
jam2 | May 15, 23:11 CET
If it's to FOX...I just don't really know if they will even give a damn.
kathylovesspike | May 15, 23:17 CET
This does sound like a major major blow, but surely there's always a chance things could change. I'm thinking that this is a good time to let Fox know there is still interest in this franchise. I say we go ahead with the postcard campaign that has been spoken about to send postcards that arrive at Fox on Whedons birthday on June 23rd, that's recently been discussed at supportspike.com
paxomen | May 15, 23:49 CET
WilliamTheB | May 15, 23:52 CET
She seemed pretty sure about what she was saying, and the fact the films had no chance of being made now. *sigh*
[ edited by sueworld2003 on 2006-05-15 21:58 ]
sueworld2003 | May 15, 23:57 CET
Right after I read that and come here to read this.
This is *not* turning out to be a good Monday.
Emma Frost | May 16, 00:01 CET
Buffyfantic | May 16, 00:02 CET
And Simon's right, disagreements with Fox on the deal probably came down to one or several of the three elements he lists. Well, maybe at some point in time we may find out some details on that. Gotta admit I'm damn curious but usually it takes some time before people get a little more loose-lipped about that stuff. Joss was pretty open later on in interviews about what went down with Firefly and such so who knows.
And no I'm not curious, I just always need to know everything. ;)
(Of course what would be REALLY funny if it wasn't quite over yet and somewhere Joss is going "Amyyyy!! Ya little blabbermouth!";)
EdDantes | May 16, 00:02 CET
I can also see Spike/Illyria together during NFA, since he started taking on the role as her "watcher" anyway, with the training and such.
I just wish we could have had THIS movie, and then if successful, take it from there. I know that Aly was saying she didn't want to be involved unless Joss wrote it, and Eliza already turned down a Faith series in favor of TRU CALLING, so I don't know how available they'd make themselves for this. Still, if there If not Willow or Faith, than certainly Xander or Giles might have been interesting.
spikeylover | May 16, 00:09 CET
I've always had loads of optimisim and hope for this project, but no more.
Apocalypse | May 16, 00:18 CET
I think its safe to say that’s not happening anymore, 'cause if they were, they’d be getting done right now.”
Is it just me or does it look like Amy Acker is assuming that there's no chance of the movie, without certainty that the movies are still an impossibility. If she knew that no deal was possible on the movies, shouldn't she have been a bit more confident as in.
I thinkitssafe to say that’snot happening anymore'cause if they were, they’d be getting done right now.”What does this mean about the brand new campaign at supportspike.com; which was gonna try to maximise the number of postcards arriving at Fox on the same day (June 23rd - in 37 days)
Campaign #9:NOT FADE AWAY?
[ edited by Dalton on 2006-05-15 22:30 ]
Dalton | May 16, 00:18 CET
ChosenOne5376 | May 16, 00:19 CET
[ edited by spikeylover on 2006-05-15 22:25 ]
spikeylover | May 16, 00:25 CET
Certainly, postcard away, but if Joss couldn't convince them, I don't think postcards are going to cut it personally.
gossi | May 16, 00:25 CET
Buffyfantic | May 16, 00:31 CET
ChosenOne5376 | May 16, 00:32 CET
gossi | May 16, 00:35 CET
Anyway, if the Spike movie did well, then maybe a big screen movie with Sarah, David, James and the scoobs might be an option that Fox would consider, or obviously the others.. Faith, Willow, etc.
Considering that BTVS is one of it's biggest sellers ever, I don't understand why it's such a problem. That's why I'm a fan and not involved in all that, I suppose.
spikeylover | May 16, 00:41 CET
eddy | May 16, 00:50 CET
gossi | May 16, 00:52 CET
The idea of Gunn becoming a vamp in season 6 sounded quite good too.
whosflyingthisthing? | May 16, 00:55 CET
Kerec | May 16, 00:59 CET
Still hope, some day, some how, some way, Buffy/Angel will hit my TV again...
ReneRitchie | May 16, 01:03 CET
Berry | May 16, 01:10 CET
Harmalicious | May 16, 01:38 CET
lynnie | May 16, 01:59 CET
Unfortunately, years into the future means no Spike, at least not James Marsters as Spike. In fact, depending on how many years it could mean not having the original cast.
killinj | May 16, 02:11 CET
But I thought that Gunn would turn into some kind of "were-panther" - a feline version of werewolf.
I wonder what kind of disagreement kept FOX from commiting to TV movies. Money? Final cut right? Choice of characters?
Moscow Watcher | May 16, 02:11 CET
Ocular | May 16, 02:13 CET
I think the potential storyline sounded interesting, would have preferred Dru there but Amy's account of what it would have been really caught my interest. All the returning characters would have been awesome. Poor Gunn.
Things look bleak but it ain't over til the fat lady sings, so to speak. Agree with Gossi, it will take something bigger than postcards to touch Fox. The possibilities are endless with enough fan support. Saving Angel kinda set a new standard for campainging. I don't think Fox sucks near as much as the WB did.
So really, anything is possible. IMO.
cheryl | May 16, 02:18 CET
I don't think this news bodes well for any future Buffyverse.
[ edited by wrikiwood on 2006-05-16 00:40 ]
wrikiwood | May 16, 02:39 CET
All that said...yes, anything can happen with this group of extremely talented people we're talking about. We've seen 'em move mountains on our behalf before. So I'll never quite give up hope of the Buffyverse returning to the screen. Ask Captain Reynolds about giving up, see what his .02 is.
MrArg | May 16, 02:40 CET
TheZeppo | May 16, 03:16 CET
Not all Btvs/Ats fans are also fans of Firefly/Serenity. I saw FF, it was ok, but I wouldn't call myself a fan so I got nothing out of that deal unfortunately.
FOX and Joss couldn't agree on stuff so I think we need to not heap all the responsibilty of this soley on FOX. It's a two way street. *sounds like Sigourney Weaver in Working Girl* 80)
lynnie | May 16, 03:27 CET
Reddygirl | May 16, 03:37 CET
But I will send my cards and hope that they get the hint that we still love the Verse and want more. Start with Spike...see if that is successful and go from there...
kathylovesspike | May 16, 03:39 CET
Firefly/Serenity proved that Joss's genius is not restricted to the Buffyverse, so I choose to look at it this way: as long as Joss is making something, I'll be happy.
pevensie | May 16, 03:47 CET
He could do fucking King Kong 2 with Queen Latifah as the monkey and I'd still be there. THAT's how much I respect, adore and support the man whose name is at the top of this page.
TheZeppo | May 16, 03:53 CET
It boggles the mind.
[ edited by Charmuse on 2006-05-16 02:05 ]
Charmuse | May 16, 04:03 CET
Us fans (we fans?) only get the finished product. We don't know the REAL behind-the-scenes. So while it may seem unfathomable to us that the network won't revitalize a story with a rabid fanbase, there has to be reasons beyond what we know. It's sad, but there's not much we can do anymore.
TheZeppo | May 16, 04:20 CET
(Only partially kidding. Hey, I'd do it!)
deanna b | May 16, 04:54 CET
eddy | May 16, 04:56 CET
I do want to hear it from Joss, though.
sari | May 16, 04:56 CET
TheZeppo | May 16, 04:58 CET
[ edited by Gwendolyn Post on 2006-05-16 03:29 ]
Gwendolyn Post | May 16, 05:26 CET
Charmuse | May 16, 05:29 CET
TheZeppo | May 16, 05:32 CET
barboo | May 16, 05:53 CET
Bionic | May 16, 07:16 CET
Nebula1400 | May 16, 07:28 CET
I'm sure Amy is speaking from what she knows at this point. And I'm sure she knows a helluva lot more than I do. But truth be told, if they pony up the dinero, it'll happen. The actors will come, Joss will write it, and we will all be bumping into walls with excitement.
Call me Cleopatra if you want, but I just can't believe that it's dead just yet.
Willowy | May 16, 07:47 CET
But, I shall not let my soul be obliterated completely until Joss gives a statement.
UnpluggedCrazy | May 16, 08:27 CET
delirium_haze | May 16, 08:38 CET
[ edited by NickSeng on 2006-05-16 06:40 ]
NickSeng | May 16, 08:39 CET
If something happens many, many years from now and our beloved actors have moved on, I'd be up for a spin off or feature with new verse characters! There are now lots o' slayers after all. Hell, I'd be up for that now.
[ edited by Harmalicious on 2006-05-16 07:06 ]
Harmalicious | May 16, 08:52 CET
Firefly Flanatic | May 16, 09:34 CET
There can be no comparison between a comic book, a novel and seeing the story on screen. I am disappointed to say the least.
For me its all about Spike and since there can't be Spike in the Joss written comic books, it looks like the verse is really over for me.
Thank god for Fan Fiction but I still really miss the visuals.
One more thing to mourn in a long train of things to mourn in this verse.
Xane | May 16, 09:46 CET
Anyway, I plan to do the postcard bit. I'm hoping lots of us die-hard fans will. I have no idea if it will have any effect, but it's worth trying. So. Whaddaya say?
SangChaud | May 16, 11:37 CET
He actually gave it last week, for those who don't watch everything. Have a look in the archives here for the video interview with Joss. He basically said he's pitched it (many and various ways? I can't remember the quote) and now he's waiting to see if anybody picks it up.
Ultimately, he's taken it to the studio, and nothing has happened.
Willowy is also, in my opinion, spot on that if somebody ponies the money, everybody could still get on board at this stage - but, personally, I don't see how that is going to happen.
So, Buffy season 8 comics for me.
gossi | May 16, 12:14 CET
On the one hand this is very depressing news. On the other hand I'm glad we got a total of 12 seasons of Buffyverse television. And as Firefly, Serenity, Astonishing X-Men and other things have proven, I'm pretty much predestined to fall for anything that Joss puts out, so I'm sure I'll be enjoying new Joss-y goodness for quite some time. It's just sad that the verse that started it all for so many of us seems to not be returning in any live action forms anytime soon.
Having said that, I am still looking forward to the Buffy S8 comics.
ETA: edited because 7 + 5 = 12, not 13. Heh.
[ edited by GVH on 2006-05-16 11:50 ]
GVH | May 16, 13:49 CET
I would say from J's reaction that he was not aware of this but seemed happy with the character development.
Starfury record the event and may eventually release DVD's.
I'll stay optimistic that we will get more verse eventually - just not right now.
The Do That Girl | May 16, 14:27 CET
It's just a few hours of time and a couple of stamps...although I plan to send as many as I can afford to. What the hell....
kathylovesspike | May 16, 15:32 CET
Maybe Serenity isn't the best example to bring up here.
If Fox thought it'd make real money, they'd greenlight it straight away. Simple. They're a business, they don't have a personal axe to grind.
PMMJ | May 16, 16:21 CET
Hmmm. Well not completely convinced by the lack of axe grindiness. But at the end of the day, it is always about the money. And in that respect I think 20th Century Fox are wrong.
Simon | May 16, 17:26 CET
"In business, everything is personal, but money rules all."
Although I just made that up.
gossi | May 16, 17:30 CET
I would still love to see these stories see the light of day, however. I hope Joss' Season 8 Buffy comics let us know what happened.
By the way, are we absolutely certain that Spike cannot appear in the Joss-written Buffy comics? I know IDW have the rights to the Spike and Angel comics, but I wonder if that's exclusive? It would certainly be nice to hear how things go for those two characters in the Season 8. Now that I think of it, though, that would have coincided with Season 5 of Angel, and Spike never told Buffy he had come back. Hmmmmmm--on to Season 9, then! LOL
greenlady | May 16, 18:37 CET
Buffyfantic | May 16, 18:54 CET
barboo | May 16, 18:59 CET
Like I said earlier in the thread while it might be easier to put all the blame, for want of a better word, on Fox there are two sides to every negotiation.
greenlady Maybe the S8 comic will do the flipside to TGIQ and instead of the back of Buffy's head dancing we'll get a frame of the back of Spike and Angel's heads fighting those heavies. Not mentioned by name but obvious who they are. They did that in one of the Ats comics with Buffy, showed her from behind and didn't name her.
lynnie | May 16, 19:09 CET
Charmuse said:
Yeah. How evil they were, to produce 12 seasons of Buffy (6 1/2), Angel (5), and Firefly (1/2) put together, plus remain willing to discuss the possibility of future continuations. They must really have had it in for the shows, huh? I fully understand why only a little over a decade of entertainment would earn your wrath.
Seriously, it's this kind of crap that makes us as a group look bad. Through accidents of timing, luck, and talent, plus a lot of hard work from a whole lot of people, our fandom got a lot more than anyone would have thought possible. Did ANYONE think, seriously think (other than Joss), that a show about a skinny white chick fighting the undead would even be able to produce a spinoff, much less go on to become a cultural touchstone?! We could have just as easily only had those first twelve episodes of Buffy, with no Angel and no Firefly. Or, to be more accurate, you would only have had those...because I never discovered Buffy until Season 6, I would have had nothing.
Yeah, okay, Fox treated Firefly shabbily, and they didn't make Serenity. But they also upped their initial order for the show several times when other networks would have just axed it. Sure, they killed Wonderfalls and The Inside, and I blame them for that. But the Wolfram and Hart of the Whedonverse? IT'S BECAUSE OF FOX THAT YOU HAVE A WHEDONVERSE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!
BAFfler | May 16, 19:14 CET
Also, as I've said before the other day here, there's some very smart people at Fox. There's also some not so smart ones. It's how it works.
gossi | May 16, 19:31 CET
Simon | May 16, 19:34 CET
As far as I know,20th Century Fox owns the Buffyverse so Joss can't just take it to another studio like he did with Serenity.With Serenity,Fox released the film rights and let Joss take them to Universal.I honestly don't think they would do the same for the Buffyverse.It's a bigger asset to them then,in there minds,Firefly was.
Fox could of refused to release the film rights to Firefly.If they had,Serenity would never of been made.
He can't really do any Buffyverse movie without 20th Century Fox's permission.
Buffyfantic | May 16, 20:32 CET
Ultimately, if - say - Paramount wanted to make a DVD feature and put the cash up, it would happen. It's the same as how Fox sold the Buffy TV show to WB, after all the other networks turned it down.
Again -- sob now -- licensing/rights is a money thing. Companies license out properties for huge sums of money.
gossi | May 16, 20:40 CET
killinj | May 16, 20:42 CET
SpikeBad | May 16, 20:42 CET
TheZeppo | May 16, 21:01 CET
Anyway. I have no idea how it would have been pulled off, but I have faith that it would have been many levels of awesome. Curses be unto the WB for the cancellation!
WilliamTheB | May 16, 21:19 CET
Dolphin Tamer | May 16, 21:56 CET
Screw TV executives.
smog | May 16, 22:16 CET
I don't think it's safe to assume it's the end of the Buffyverse at all. Life is long.
Or something.
gossi | May 16, 22:26 CET
[ edited by Cider on 2006-05-16 20:35 ]
Cider | May 16, 22:34 CET
kathylovesspike | May 16, 22:54 CET
Oh,yeah...there will be postcards. Just wish I could do more.
Berry | May 16, 23:20 CET
annieb | May 17, 00:49 CET
Amy also mentioned this to me and a friend on Friday night (this particular talk was on Sunday) because she was signing some post NFA comics for us and we were talking about Gunn still being alive and she told us those plans, so it's definitely what she said.
The Do That Girl said:
The talk where Amy said this won't be on there, though, as J (and also Christian) have clauses in their contracts at these events that their talks won't be recorded, as they feel more comfortable saying whatever they like on stage knowing they aren't being recorded. As this was an Amy/J/Vincent talk, it won't make it to the DVD, should Sean do one.
Also, if Joss is sitting somewhere going "Aaaaaamy! Shhh!", Vincent agreed to take the blame for spilling the beans. :D
RachVG | May 17, 12:34 CET
The Do That Girl | May 17, 18:02 CET
The King is dead (buffiverse on the tube)
Long live the King (Whedon creativity)
Nancy Boy hair Gel | May 18, 02:02 CET
And what I think people are forgetting is that it's only been two years this month since the end of Angel. James gave Joss five years, so there's still three years for something to happen. True, James said recently that there's only a year and a half left of the five years, but that's what's known as an exaggeration to make a point that time is fleeting. He hasn't suddenly invented a new kind of mathematics in which 3.5 = 5. It's not over yet.
And as for the "If it hasn't happened yet, it's not going to happen," might I point out that the post-series Alien Nation movies didn't finally become a reality until nearly five years after the series was cancelled with a cliffhanger ending, and they wound up making four more TV-movies in the next three years. And as I said, it was around that amount of time that it took for any post-Star Trek to surface. So two years since Angel with nothing more yet doesn't strike me as meaning that we should just throw up our hands and give up.
deanna b | May 18, 03:47 CET
ramses 2 | May 18, 04:06 CET
RachVG | May 18, 05:03 CET